[Libosinfo] [PATCH] rhel: Specify resources for all RHEL 6 releases

[Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)]

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> NACK, this only addresses half of the review comments.

Can you please explain 1207959552 is not 1GB? Do you happen to mean
1000000000? The reason the term 'GiB' exists is because while GB might
mean 1000000000, its almost always misused to mean 1207959552. If
thats what you meant, Why do you want to use that value when you
yourself are saying that its less accurate? Also why is it so
important to use the less accurate value that these patches have to be
NACKed for it?

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124