[Libosinfo] [PATCH 03/11] centos, test: Add OS info/testcase for CentOS 6.0
Christophe Fergeau
cfergeau at redhat.com
Tue Apr 2 09:20:05 UTC 2013
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:30:19PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com>wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 03:09:26PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > ---
> > > data/oses/centos.xml.in | 22
> > ++++++++++++++++
> > > .../centos6.0/CentOS-6.0-i386-bin-DVD.iso.txt | 29
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > .../centos6.0/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD1.iso.txt | 29
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > test/test-isodetect.c | 6 +++++
> > > 4 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644
> > test/isodata/centos/centos6.0/CentOS-6.0-i386-bin-DVD.iso.txt
> > > create mode 100644
> > test/isodata/centos/centos6.0/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD1.iso.txt
> > >
> > > diff --git a/data/oses/centos.xml.in b/data/oses/centos.xml.in
> > > index 3f09dea..bb8e570 100644
> > > --- a/data/oses/centos.xml.in
> > > +++ b/data/oses/centos.xml.in
> > > @@ -16,13 +16,35 @@
> > > <system-id>LINUX</system-id>
> > > <volume-id>CentOS_6.0_Final</volume-id>
> > > </iso>
> > > + <kernel>isolinux/vmlinuz</kernel>
> > > + <initrd>isolinux/initrd.img</initrd>
> > > </media>
> > > <media arch="x86_64">
> > > <iso>
> > > <system-id>LINUX</system-id>
> > > <volume-id>CentOS_6.0_Final</volume-id>
> > > </iso>
> > > + <kernel>isolinux/vmlinuz</kernel>
> > > + <initrd>isolinux/initrd.img</initrd>
> > > </media>
> > > +
> > > + <resources arch="all">
> > > + <minimum>
> > > + <n-cpus>1</n-cpus>
> > > + <ram>536870912</ram>
> > > + </minimum>
> > > +
> > > + <recommended>
> > > + <cpu>400000000</cpu>
> > > + <ram>1073741824</ram>
> > > + <storage>9663676416</storage>
> > > + </recommended>
> > > + </resources>
> > > +
> > > + <installer>
> > > + <script id='http://redhat.com/scripts/rhel/jeos'/>
> > > + <script id='http://redhat.com/scripts/rhel/desktop'/>
> > > + </installer>
> >
> > This gets back to a question I had while I was writing the openSUSE
> > patches, should we be duplicating this info, or should this be inherited
> > through the clones/derives-from elements if it's not set?
> >
>
> IMHO, this info should be inherited through the clones/derives-from
> elements.
> Should I change it? :-)
If you feel like writing a patch for that, sure. Otherwise I guess we can
take this patch as is for now.
Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/attachments/20130402/2152b64b/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libosinfo
mailing list