[Libosinfo] [PATCH 8/8] winxp, installer: Make use of post-installation drivers

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeeshanak at gnome.org
Mon Jan 28 21:06:53 UTC 2013


On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:45:25PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > You can't expect every possible Windows exe file to honour the /S switch.
>>
>> If a binary doesn't support '/S' switch, it will ignore it?
>
> Or fail saying it's an unknown parameter?

According to Vmware docs, this is a standard MSI option:

http://pubs.vmware.com/view-50/index.jsp?topic=/com.vmware.view.installation.doc/GUID-F19EBDF6-20A3-4A8B-95AE-786CC74F26AF.html

If that is the case, its supposed to be guaranteed on every windows
installer setup app?

>> > I'd tend to go with a list of files + a .cmd file which contains the actual
>> > commands to run (osinfo-*.cmd would be even better but I'm not 100% sure
>> > Windows accept such wildcards).
>> > This would let us handle .msi file, unpacked drivers should be possible too
>> > with an appropriate .cmd file, ...
>>
>> This would mean that either us or the driver setup distributor will
>> have to provide a cmd file with it?
>
> Yup, but we currently only have a single binary to support, and there is
> already a need for a flag, so we need a way to support this in a more
> flexible way than hardcoding it in libosinfo imo.

I'd want to avoid hardcoding as well but at the same time I would hate
to ask driver distributors (or anyone who wants to add drivers to db
in future) to have to write a .cmd file per driver so I'll first want
to know if we are worrying for a good reason.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124




More information about the Libosinfo mailing list