[Libosinfo] [PATCH 2/3] fedora: More correct/appr. system reqs for F19

[Christophe Fergeau]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:28:20PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> I think we should specify some sane recommended values. There is a
> reason why minimum and recommended are kept separate. The doc might be
> vague but one thing is clear from it: Better have more resources than
> these minimum ones if possible.

I could have said that with no doc ;) If we want to make guesses as your
2x, maybe it's better done in applications, or in libvirt-designer, when
only minimal resources are defined, make some guesses for recommended ones?

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/attachments/20130910/8f1b5a05/attachment.sig>