[Libosinfo] [PATCH 2/3] fedora: More correct/appr. system reqs for F19

[Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 06:09:57PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:28:20PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> > I think we should specify some sane recommended values. There is a
>> > reason why minimum and recommended are kept separate. The doc might be
>> > vague but one thing is clear from it: Better have more resources than
>> > these minimum ones if possible.
>>
>> I could have said that with no doc ;) If we want to make guesses as your
>> 2x, maybe it's better done in applications, or in libvirt-designer, when
>> only minimal resources are defined, make some guesses for recommended ones?
>
> Yeah, I think libosinfo should really stick to reporting clear facts
> only. So if distros don't provide any "recommended" defaults we should
> leave them blank, so that users of libosinfo are clear that this info
> is not defined. The apps can use 2 x minimum if they so wish.

Agreed. I didn't realize that my patch is making a policy decision,
which is usually better to keep in apps.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124