[Libosinfo] [PATCH 4/7] Changed vendor from Novell to SUSE on SLE oses

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:40:38PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:09:35PM +0200, Cédric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > ---
> >  data/oses/suse.xml.in | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/data/oses/suse.xml.in b/data/oses/suse.xml.in
> > index dbd190a..ba98d9c 100644
> > --- a/data/oses/suse.xml.in
> > +++ b/data/oses/suse.xml.in
> > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> >      <short-id>sles9</short-id>
> >      <_name>Suse Linux Enterprise Server 9</_name>
> >      <version>9</version>
> > -    <_vendor>Novell</_vendor>
> > +    <_vendor>SUSE</_vendor>
> 
> Was it released by SUSE or Novell? If it was released by Novell, I'm not
> sure we want to change <vendor> to what it is now, rather than to what it
> was when it was released. If it was released by SUSE, ACK to the whole
> patch.

Even when owned by Novell, it was still run as a subsiduary called
SUSE, so I think it is right that we call it SUSE throughout the
file. We don't need to trace our way up the corporate ownership
ladder :-)

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|