[Libosinfo] Anyone watching the fedorahosted bug tracker?

[Cole Robinson]

On 04/16/2014 04:26 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
> The libosinfo bug tracker seems to be entirely ignored, doesn't look like any
> bug that's ever been filed has had a response:
> 
> https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/report/8
> 
> There's at least 3 patches in there as well.
> 
> I assume this is mostly due to trac being really easy to ignore, and default
> assignee + cc list not setup. How do people feel about moving the bug tracker
> to bugzilla.redhat.com product=Virtualization Tools, which is what libvirt*,
> libguestfs, and virt-manager use.
> 
> If so the process would be:
> 
> - request the component with bugzilla-requests at redhat.com. they will need
> default assignee and cc list at least.
> - change libosinfo.org to point to the bugzilla instance rather than trac
> - once that's done, transfer over all the trac bugs, though I suspect many of
> them are obsolete.
> - send a request to fedora infrastructure to disable the trac bug tracker for
> https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/    (in fact, they can probably disable
> this page entirely, it's redundant since there's already libosinfo.org)
> 

So this died a bit. If libosinfo moves to freedesktop.org, it should use their
bug tracker. But Dan wasn't interested in moving there. I don't really have a
preference.

The alternative bits discussed (moving to libvirt.org, etc) are all
independent of moving the bug tracker. And there was general agreement with
moving away from trac.

So unless anyone says otherwise by Saturday, I'll initiate the above steps to
create the bugzilla.redhat.com tracker and turn off the trac instance. I'll use:

default assignee: zali at redhat.com
cc list: berrange at redhat.com, cfergeau at redhat.com

Anyone else? And do we want to add the mailing list to CC ?

- Cole