[Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo 2/3] Add CentOS 7.0

[Fabiano Fidêncio]

Hey,


On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hey,
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:01:40PM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan at redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  data/oses/centos.xml.in                            | 40
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../centos7.0/CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt   | 29 ++++++++++++++++
> >  .../CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-Everything.iso.txt      | 29 ++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644
> test/isodata/centos/centos7.0/CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
> >  create mode 100644
> test/isodata/centos/centos7.0/CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-Everything.iso.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/data/oses/centos.xml.in b/data/oses/centos.xml.in
> > index 7f53bb4..3c79918 100644
> > --- a/data/oses/centos.xml.in
> > +++ b/data/oses/centos.xml.in
> > @@ -277,4 +277,44 @@
> >      </installer>
> >    </os>
> >
> > +  <os id="http://centos.org/centos/7.0">
> > +    <short-id>centos7.0</short-id>
> > +    <_name>CentOS 7.0</_name>
> > +    <version>7.0</version>
>
> This bit is slightly inaccurate,
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-July/020393.html
> says:
> « This is the first release for CentOS-7 and is version marked as
> 7.0-1406 »
>
> We should at least reflect this in the <version> field, and maybe in the
> <name> too.
>

Hmm. I disagree.
Are we adding new entries for every 7.0-x release?


>
> Christophe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libosinfo mailing list
> Libosinfo at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
>
>


-- 
Fabiano Fidêncio
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/attachments/20140729/d7a998a6/attachment.htm>