From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 11:36:29 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:36:29 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] debian: fix architecture names to
match schema
Message-ID: <20170707113629.11853-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
The schema has names for architectures which are closer to the RPM
naming than the dpkg one -- thus, fix:
- arm64 -> aarch64
- armhf -> armv7l
Fixes commit 5d852472685792a240dc1738e051a59793c47b18.
---
data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in b/data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in
index e0b9085..80cc048 100644
--- a/data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in
+++ b/data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
install.amd/vmlinuz
install.amd/initrd.gz
-
+
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/current/arm64/iso-cd/debian-9.0.0-arm64-netinst.iso
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
install.arm64/vmlinuz
install.arm64/initrd.gz
-
+
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/current/armhf/iso-cd/debian-9.0.0-armhf-netinst.iso
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
install.amd/vmlinuz
install.amd/initrd.gz
-
+
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/9.0.0/arm64/iso-dvd/debian-9.0.0-arm64-DVD-1.iso
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
install.arm64/vmlinuz
install.arm64/initrd.gz
-
+
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/9.0.0/armhf/iso-dvd/debian-9.0.0-armhf-DVD-1.iso
--
2.9.4
From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 11:44:05 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:44:05 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] ubuntu: add EOL date for 16.10
Message-ID: <20170707114405.12890-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Source:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2017-July/000222.html
---
data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.10.xml.in | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.10.xml.in b/data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.10.xml.in
index bea4182..60031d2 100644
--- a/data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.10.xml.in
+++ b/data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.10.xml.in
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
2016-10-13
+ 2017-07-20
--
2.9.4
From agx at sigxcpu.org Fri Jul 7 13:59:39 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 15:59:39 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] debian: fix architecture names to
match schema
In-Reply-To: <20170707113629.11853-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
References: <20170707113629.11853-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170707135939.zndi3sm6vyxd3rrv@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:36:29PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> The schema has names for architectures which are closer to the RPM
> naming than the dpkg one -- thus, fix:
> - arm64 -> aarch64
> - armhf -> armv7l
Are the ones in libosinfo/tests/test-isodetect.c the right ones? Asking
since I intend to add all our architectures and flavours in the future
(once I get around to automate this).
>
> Fixes commit 5d852472685792a240dc1738e051a59793c47b18.
> ---
> data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in b/data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in
> index e0b9085..80cc048 100644
> --- a/data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in
> +++ b/data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
> install.amd/vmlinuz
> install.amd/initrd.gz
>
> -
> +
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/current/arm64/iso-cd/debian-9.0.0-arm64-netinst.iso
>
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
> install.arm64/vmlinuz
> install.arm64/initrd.gz
>
> -
> +
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/current/armhf/iso-cd/debian-9.0.0-armhf-netinst.iso
>
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
> install.amd/vmlinuz
> install.amd/initrd.gz
>
> -
> +
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/9.0.0/arm64/iso-dvd/debian-9.0.0-arm64-DVD-1.iso
>
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
> install.arm64/vmlinuz
> install.arm64/initrd.gz
>
> -
> +
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/9.0.0/armhf/iso-dvd/debian-9.0.0-armhf-DVD-1.iso
>
ACK.
-- Guido
> --
> 2.9.4
>
From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 14:23:53 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 16:23:53 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] debian: fix architecture names to
match schema
In-Reply-To: <20170707135939.zndi3sm6vyxd3rrv@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
References: <20170707113629.11853-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
<20170707135939.zndi3sm6vyxd3rrv@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Message-ID: <2323006.BksoeDfUdT@thyrus.usersys.redhat.com>
On Friday, 7 July 2017 15:59:39 CEST Guido G?nther wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:36:29PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > The schema has names for architectures which are closer to the RPM
> > naming than the dpkg one -- thus, fix:
> > - arm64 -> aarch64
> > - armhf -> armv7l
>
> Are the ones in libosinfo/tests/test-isodetect.c the right ones? Asking
> since I intend to add all our architectures and flavours in the future
> (once I get around to automate this).
Do you mean the various string findings in the "load_iso" function?
To me, that looks more like an heuristic to guess the architecture of
the test data based on its filename, rather than the
One place with the canonical list of the architectures is in osinfo-db,
data/schema/osinfo.rng.in, the "archnames" define.
PS: please remember to run `make check` in osinfo-db ;-)
> [...]
>
> ACK.
> -- Guido
Thanks! Can you please push it?
--
Pino Toscano
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
From berrange at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 14:27:04 2017
From: berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrange)
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 15:27:04 +0100
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] debian: fix architecture names to
match schema
In-Reply-To: <20170707135939.zndi3sm6vyxd3rrv@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
References: <20170707113629.11853-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
<20170707135939.zndi3sm6vyxd3rrv@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Message-ID: <20170707142704.GE15945@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:59:39PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:36:29PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > The schema has names for architectures which are closer to the RPM
> > naming than the dpkg one -- thus, fix:
> > - arm64 -> aarch64
> > - armhf -> armv7l
>
> Are the ones in libosinfo/tests/test-isodetect.c the right ones? Asking
> since I intend to add all our architectures and flavours in the future
> (once I get around to automate this).
Valid architecture names are defined in data/schema/osinfo.rng are were
chosen to match libvirt arch names.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
From agx at sigxcpu.org Fri Jul 7 16:10:11 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 18:10:11 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] debian: fix architecture names to
match schema
In-Reply-To: <2323006.BksoeDfUdT@thyrus.usersys.redhat.com>
References: <20170707113629.11853-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
<20170707135939.zndi3sm6vyxd3rrv@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
<2323006.BksoeDfUdT@thyrus.usersys.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170707161011.tnj66ucnqg2yvzvp@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 04:23:53PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> On Friday, 7 July 2017 15:59:39 CEST Guido G?nther wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:36:29PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > The schema has names for architectures which are closer to the RPM
> > > naming than the dpkg one -- thus, fix:
> > > - arm64 -> aarch64
> > > - armhf -> armv7l
> >
> > Are the ones in libosinfo/tests/test-isodetect.c the right ones? Asking
> > since I intend to add all our architectures and flavours in the future
> > (once I get around to automate this).
>
> Do you mean the various string findings in the "load_iso" function?
> To me, that looks more like an heuristic to guess the architecture of
> the test data based on its filename, rather than the
>
> One place with the canonical list of the architectures is in osinfo-db,
> data/schema/osinfo.rng.in, the "archnames" define.
>
> PS: please remember to run `make check` in osinfo-db ;-)
Oh...didn't notice that we have that yet. Will do, the Debian package
just uploaded does this too now.
>
> > [...]
> >
> > ACK.
> > -- Guido
>
> Thanks! Can you please push it?
Done. Thanks!
-- Guido
>
> --
> Pino Toscano
From agx at sigxcpu.org Mon Jul 10 06:51:34 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:51:34 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] tests: add Debian 9.0 test data
In-Reply-To: <20170627112226.2e44dc2slcevogih@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
References: <20170627112226.2e44dc2slcevogih@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Message-ID: <20170710065134.w4dng7tszdpf5qcw@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:22:26PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> ---
> .../debian9/debian-9.0-amd64-netinst.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../debian/debian9/debian-9.0-amd64.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../debian9/debian-9.0-arm64-netinst.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../debian/debian9/debian-9.0-arm64.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../debian9/debian-9.0-armhf-netinst.iso.txt | 16 ++++++++++++
> .../debian/debian9/debian-9.0-armhf.iso.txt | 16 ++++++++++++
> .../debian/debian9/debian-9.0-i386-netinst.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-i386.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 8 files changed, 206 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-amd64-netinst.iso.txt
> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-amd64.iso.txt
> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-arm64-netinst.iso.txt
> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-arm64.iso.txt
> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-armhf-netinst.iso.txt
> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-armhf.iso.txt
> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-i386-netinst.iso.txt
> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-i386.iso.txt
>
> Since the mailing list rejects this as spam I've created a fork on
> gitlab here:
>
> https://gitlab.com/agx1/libosinfo/commit/117029715f90c5c7a2f2a996b21e9fefca6585c8
Ping?
-- Guido
>
> Cheers,
> -- Guido
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libosinfo mailing list
> Libosinfo at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
>
From fidencio at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 11:39:51 2017
From: fidencio at redhat.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Fabiano_Fid=C3=AAncio?=)
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:39:51 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] tests: add Debian 9.0 test data
In-Reply-To: <20170710065134.w4dng7tszdpf5qcw@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
References: <20170627112226.2e44dc2slcevogih@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
<20170710065134.w4dng7tszdpf5qcw@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Message-ID:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Guido G?nther wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:22:26PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
>> ---
>> .../debian9/debian-9.0-amd64-netinst.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../debian/debian9/debian-9.0-amd64.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../debian9/debian-9.0-arm64-netinst.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../debian/debian9/debian-9.0-arm64.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../debian9/debian-9.0-armhf-netinst.iso.txt | 16 ++++++++++++
>> .../debian/debian9/debian-9.0-armhf.iso.txt | 16 ++++++++++++
>> .../debian/debian9/debian-9.0-i386-netinst.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-i386.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 8 files changed, 206 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-amd64-netinst.iso.txt
>> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-amd64.iso.txt
>> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-arm64-netinst.iso.txt
>> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-arm64.iso.txt
>> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-armhf-netinst.iso.txt
>> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-armhf.iso.txt
>> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-i386-netinst.iso.txt
>> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-i386.iso.txt
>>
>> Since the mailing list rejects this as spam I've created a fork on
>> gitlab here:
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/agx1/libosinfo/commit/117029715f90c5c7a2f2a996b21e9fefca6585c8
>
> Ping?
ACK!
> -- Guido
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -- Guido
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libosinfo mailing list
>> Libosinfo at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libosinfo mailing list
> Libosinfo at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
From fidencio at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 11:41:18 2017
From: fidencio at redhat.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Fabiano_Fid=C3=AAncio?=)
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:41:18 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] rhel: Add RHEL 7.4 info
In-Reply-To: <20170622150017.13426-1-feborges@redhat.com>
References: <20170622150017.13426-1-feborges@redhat.com>
Message-ID:
Felipe,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Felipe Borges wrote:
>
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 is not released yet,
> but we would like to support 7.4 in 7.4
Thanks for your patch! I'd prefer to have it applied to our git master
as soon as 7.4 is released.
So, please, when it happens, may I ask you to re-submit the patch with
the test data as well?
It's a NACK for now.
Best Regards,
.
>
> ---
> data/os/redhat.com/rhel-7.4.xml.in | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 data/os/redhat.com/rhel-7.4.xml.in
>
> diff --git a/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-7.4.xml.in b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-7.4.xml.in
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f9c918f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-7.4.xml.in
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> +
> +
> +
> + rhel7.4
> + <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4
> + 7.4
> + <_vendor>Red Hat, Inc
> + linux
> + rhel
> + Maipo
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + LINUX
> + .*RHEL-7.4.*x86_64.*
> +
> + isolinux/vmlinuz
> + isolinux/initrd.img
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + LINUX
> + RHEL-7.4.*aarch64$
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + PPC
> + RHEL-7.4.*ppc64$
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + PPC
> + RHEL-7.4.*ppc64le$
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + LINUX
> + RHEL-7.4.*s390x$
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + 1
> + 1000000000
> + 2147483648
> + 10737418240
> +
> +
> +
> + 400000000
> + 2147483648
> + 21474836480
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + 1
> + 1000000000
> + 1073741824
> + 10737418240
> +
> +
> +
> + 400000000
> + 1073741824
> + 9663676416
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> --
> 2.13.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libosinfo mailing list
> Libosinfo at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
From agx at sigxcpu.org Tue Jul 11 06:20:20 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 08:20:20 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] tests: add Debian 9.0 test data
In-Reply-To:
References: <20170627112226.2e44dc2slcevogih@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
<20170710065134.w4dng7tszdpf5qcw@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Message-ID: <20170711062019.kbnkrs5hvmznq4cw@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:39:51PM +0200, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Guido G?nther wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:22:26PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> >> ---
> >> .../debian9/debian-9.0-amd64-netinst.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> .../debian/debian9/debian-9.0-amd64.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> .../debian9/debian-9.0-arm64-netinst.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> .../debian/debian9/debian-9.0-arm64.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> .../debian9/debian-9.0-armhf-netinst.iso.txt | 16 ++++++++++++
> >> .../debian/debian9/debian-9.0-armhf.iso.txt | 16 ++++++++++++
> >> .../debian/debian9/debian-9.0-i386-netinst.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> .../isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-i386.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 8 files changed, 206 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-amd64-netinst.iso.txt
> >> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-amd64.iso.txt
> >> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-arm64-netinst.iso.txt
> >> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-arm64.iso.txt
> >> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-armhf-netinst.iso.txt
> >> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-armhf.iso.txt
> >> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-i386-netinst.iso.txt
> >> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/debian/debian9/debian-9.0-i386.iso.txt
> >>
> >> Since the mailing list rejects this as spam I've created a fork on
> >> gitlab here:
> >>
> >> https://gitlab.com/agx1/libosinfo/commit/117029715f90c5c7a2f2a996b21e9fefca6585c8
> >
> > Ping?
>
> ACK!
Pushed. Thanks!
-- Guido
>
> > -- Guido
> >
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> -- Guido
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Libosinfo mailing list
> >> Libosinfo at redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libosinfo mailing list
> > Libosinfo at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
>
From ptoscano at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 15:57:21 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:57:21 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] fedora: add Fedora 26 info
Message-ID: <20170711155721.1765-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Just released earlier today.
---
data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-26.xml.in | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 114 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-26.xml.in
diff --git a/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-26.xml.in b/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-26.xml.in
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d1816ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-26.xml.in
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+
+
+
+ fedora26
+ <_name>Fedora 26
+ 26
+ <_vendor>Fedora Project
+ linux
+ fedora
+
+
+
+ 2017-07-11
+
+
+ <_name>Fedora 26 Workstation
+
+
+ <_name>Fedora 26 Workstation
+
+
+ <_name>Fedora 26 Server
+
+
+ <_name>Fedora 26 Server
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/26/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso
+
+ Fedora-WS-Live-26.*
+ LINUX
+
+ isolinux/vmlinuz
+ isolinux/initrd.img
+
+
+
+
+
+ https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/26/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso
+
+ Fedora-WS-dvd-x86_64-26
+ LINUX
+
+ isolinux/vmlinuz
+ isolinux/initrd.img
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/26/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-26-1.5.iso
+
+ Fedora-S-dvd-x86_64-26
+ LINUX
+ 2400741376
+
+ isolinux/vmlinuz
+ isolinux/initrd.img
+
+
+
+
+
+ http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/26/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso
+
+ Fedora-S-dvd-x86_64-26
+ LINUX
+ 507422720
+
+ isolinux/vmlinuz
+ isolinux/initrd.img
+
+
+
+ http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/26/Server/x86_64/os/
+
+
+ Fedora
+ 26
+ x86_64
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ 1
+ 1000000000
+ 1073741824
+ 10737418240
+
+
+
+ 2147483648
+ 21474836480
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
--
2.9.4
From ptoscano at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 15:58:59 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:58:59 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [libosinfo PATCH] fedora: add Fedora 26 test data
In-Reply-To: <20170711155721.1765-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
References: <20170711155721.1765-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170711155859.1967-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
---
.../Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
...edora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 116 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
diff --git a/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..03d3d4d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id: LINUX
+Volume id: Fedora-S-dvd-x86_64-26
+Volume set id:
+Publisher id:
+Data preparer id:
+Application id: GENISOIMAGE ISO 9660/HFS FILESYSTEM CREATOR (C) 1993 E.YOUNGDALE (C) 1997-2006 J.PEARSON/J.SCHILLING (C) 2006-2007 CDRKIT TEAM
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 1172237
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 483
+Joliet with UCS level 3 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 3C7DE 247774
diff --git a/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6b00229
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id: LINUX
+Volume id: Fedora-S-dvd-x86_64-26
+Volume set id:
+Publisher id:
+Data preparer id:
+Application id: GENISOIMAGE ISO 9660/HFS FILESYSTEM CREATOR (C) 1993 E.YOUNGDALE (C) 1997-2006 J.PEARSON/J.SCHILLING (C) 2006-2007 CDRKIT TEAM
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 247765
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 44
+Joliet with UCS level 3 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 3BA6E 244334
diff --git a/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5df6286
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id: LINUX
+Volume id: Fedora-WS-Live-26-1-5
+Volume set id:
+Publisher id:
+Data preparer id:
+Application id: GENISOIMAGE ISO 9660/HFS FILESYSTEM CREATOR (C) 1993 E.YOUNGDALE (C) 1997-2006 J.PEARSON/J.SCHILLING (C) 2006-2007 CDRKIT TEAM
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 763281
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 46
+Joliet with UCS level 3 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 5748 22344
diff --git a/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c3eea05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id: LINUX
+Volume id: Fedora-WS-dvd-x86_64-26
+Volume set id:
+Publisher id:
+Data preparer id:
+Application id: GENISOIMAGE ISO 9660/HFS FILESYSTEM CREATOR (C) 1993 E.YOUNGDALE (C) 1997-2006 J.PEARSON/J.SCHILLING (C) 2006-2007 CDRKIT TEAM
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 246513
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 44
+Joliet with UCS level 3 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 3B58A 243082
--
2.9.4
From agx at sigxcpu.org Tue Jul 11 19:58:26 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 21:58:26 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] test-isodetect: add Debian's arm
flavours
Message-ID: <20170711195826.yg4gs2r62x4ojx6q@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
to avoid "Unknown arch" debug messges
---
tests/test-isodetect.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/test-isodetect.c b/tests/test-isodetect.c
index c72b8fc..6a38963 100644
--- a/tests/test-isodetect.c
+++ b/tests/test-isodetect.c
@@ -128,8 +128,12 @@ static struct ISOInfo *load_iso(GFile *file, const gchar *shortid, const gchar *
arch = "ia64";
else if (strstr(name, "s390x"))
arch = "s390x";
- else if (strstr(name, "aarch64"))
+ else if (strstr(name, "aarch64") ||
+ strstr(name, "arm64"))
arch = "aarch64";
+ else if (strstr(name, "armhf") ||
+ strstr(name, "armv7l"))
+ arch = "armhf";
else {
g_debug("Unknown arch in %s", name);
arch = "i386";
--
2.13.2
From agx at sigxcpu.org Tue Jul 11 20:00:26 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:00:26 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] test-isodetect: fix parsing of
application, system and publisher id
Message-ID: <20170711200026.wzsxeustwdimq2dy@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
---
tests/test-isodetect.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/test-isodetect.c b/tests/test-isodetect.c
index 0e9aea5..c72b8fc 100644
--- a/tests/test-isodetect.c
+++ b/tests/test-isodetect.c
@@ -146,13 +146,13 @@ static struct ISOInfo *load_iso(GFile *file, const gchar *shortid, const gchar *
value = line + strlen("Volume id: ");
} else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "Publisher id: ")) {
key = OSINFO_MEDIA_PROP_PUBLISHER_ID;
- value = line + strlen("Volume id: ");
+ value = line + strlen("Publisher id: ");
} else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "System id: ")) {
key = OSINFO_MEDIA_PROP_SYSTEM_ID;
- value = line + strlen("Volume id: ");
+ value = line + strlen("System id: ");
} else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "Application id: ")) {
key = OSINFO_MEDIA_PROP_APPLICATION_ID;
- value = line + strlen("Volume id: ");
+ value = line + strlen("Application id: ");
} else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "Logical block size is: ")) {
blk_size = (gint64) atoll(line + strlen("Logical block size is: "));
} else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "Volume size is: ")) {
--
2.13.2
From cfergeau at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 07:33:15 2017
From: cfergeau at redhat.com (Christophe Fergeau)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:33:15 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] test-isodetect: fix parsing of
application, system and publisher id
In-Reply-To: <20170711200026.wzsxeustwdimq2dy@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
References: <20170711200026.wzsxeustwdimq2dy@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Message-ID: <20170712073315.bjxjllibaujdp6ji@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:00:26PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> ---
> tests/test-isodetect.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/test-isodetect.c b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> index 0e9aea5..c72b8fc 100644
> --- a/tests/test-isodetect.c
> +++ b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> @@ -146,13 +146,13 @@ static struct ISOInfo *load_iso(GFile *file, const gchar *shortid, const gchar *
> value = line + strlen("Volume id: ");
> } else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "Publisher id: ")) {
> key = OSINFO_MEDIA_PROP_PUBLISHER_ID;
> - value = line + strlen("Volume id: ");
> + value = line + strlen("Publisher id: ");
> } else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "System id: ")) {
> key = OSINFO_MEDIA_PROP_SYSTEM_ID;
> - value = line + strlen("Volume id: ");
> + value = line + strlen("System id: ");
> } else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "Application id: ")) {
> key = OSINFO_MEDIA_PROP_APPLICATION_ID;
> - value = line + strlen("Volume id: ");
> + value = line + strlen("Application id: ");
> } else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "Logical block size is: ")) {
> blk_size = (gint64) atoll(line + strlen("Logical block size is: "));
> } else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "Volume size is: ")) {
> --
> 2.13.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libosinfo mailing list
> Libosinfo at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From cfergeau at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 07:35:16 2017
From: cfergeau at redhat.com (Christophe Fergeau)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:35:16 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] test-isodetect: add Debian's arm
flavours
In-Reply-To: <20170711195826.yg4gs2r62x4ojx6q@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
References: <20170711195826.yg4gs2r62x4ojx6q@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Message-ID: <20170712073516.tj4cwhvcdvyrxdrl@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:58:26PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> to avoid "Unknown arch" debug messges
> ---
> tests/test-isodetect.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/test-isodetect.c b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> index c72b8fc..6a38963 100644
> --- a/tests/test-isodetect.c
> +++ b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> @@ -128,8 +128,12 @@ static struct ISOInfo *load_iso(GFile *file, const gchar *shortid, const gchar *
> arch = "ia64";
> else if (strstr(name, "s390x"))
> arch = "s390x";
> - else if (strstr(name, "aarch64"))
> + else if (strstr(name, "aarch64") ||
> + strstr(name, "arm64"))
> arch = "aarch64";
This change looks good.
> + else if (strstr(name, "armhf") ||
> + strstr(name, "armv7l"))
> + arch = "armhf";
However for this one I'd expect arch = "armv7l" as this is what is in
the RNG schema? My understanding of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719609#c13 is that armv7l is
a soft floating point arch, armv7hl would be hard floating point. And
armhf is hard floating point as well. So I don't think we can consider
the 2 are the same here. You probably need to add a new ARM arch to the
schema file, and use that for armhf.
Christophe
> else {
> g_debug("Unknown arch in %s", name);
> arch = "i386";
> --
> 2.13.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libosinfo mailing list
> Libosinfo at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From cfergeau at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 07:42:18 2017
From: cfergeau at redhat.com (Christophe Fergeau)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:42:18 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] fedora: add Fedora 26 info
In-Reply-To: <20170711155721.1765-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
References: <20170711155721.1765-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170712074218.6xxhfyva32nbdt2y@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau
(do you have commit access to the git repo?)
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 05:57:21PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Just released earlier today.
> ---
> data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-26.xml.in | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-26.xml.in
>
> diff --git a/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-26.xml.in b/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-26.xml.in
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d1816ec
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-26.xml.in
> @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
> +
> +
> +
> + fedora26
> + <_name>Fedora 26
> + 26
> + <_vendor>Fedora Project
> + linux
> + fedora
> +
> +
> +
> + 2017-07-11
> +
> +
> + <_name>Fedora 26 Workstation
> +
> +
> + <_name>Fedora 26 Workstation
> +
> +
> + <_name>Fedora 26 Server
> +
> +
> + <_name>Fedora 26 Server
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/26/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso
> +
> + Fedora-WS-Live-26.*
> + LINUX
> +
> + isolinux/vmlinuz
> + isolinux/initrd.img
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/26/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso
> +
> + Fedora-WS-dvd-x86_64-26
> + LINUX
> +
> + isolinux/vmlinuz
> + isolinux/initrd.img
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/26/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-26-1.5.iso
> +
> + Fedora-S-dvd-x86_64-26
> + LINUX
> + 2400741376
> +
> + isolinux/vmlinuz
> + isolinux/initrd.img
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/26/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso
> +
> + Fedora-S-dvd-x86_64-26
> + LINUX
> + 507422720
> +
> + isolinux/vmlinuz
> + isolinux/initrd.img
> +
> +
> +
> + http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/26/Server/x86_64/os/
> +
> +
> + Fedora
> + 26
> + x86_64
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + 1
> + 1000000000
> + 1073741824
> + 10737418240
> +
> +
> +
> + 2147483648
> + 21474836480
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> --
> 2.9.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libosinfo mailing list
> Libosinfo at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From cfergeau at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 07:42:35 2017
From: cfergeau at redhat.com (Christophe Fergeau)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:42:35 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [libosinfo PATCH] fedora: add Fedora 26 test data
In-Reply-To: <20170711155859.1967-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
References: <20170711155721.1765-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
<20170711155859.1967-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170712074235.ovwrvqxvnz5xvmsl@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 05:58:59PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> ---
> .../Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> ...edora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
> create mode 100644 tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
>
> diff --git a/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..03d3d4d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
> +System id: LINUX
> +Volume id: Fedora-S-dvd-x86_64-26
> +Volume set id:
> +Publisher id:
> +Data preparer id:
> +Application id: GENISOIMAGE ISO 9660/HFS FILESYSTEM CREATOR (C) 1993 E.YOUNGDALE (C) 1997-2006 J.PEARSON/J.SCHILLING (C) 2006-2007 CDRKIT TEAM
> +Copyright File id:
> +Abstract File id:
> +Bibliographic File id:
> +Volume set size is: 1
> +Volume set sequence number is: 1
> +Logical block size is: 2048
> +Volume size is: 1172237
> +El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 483
> +Joliet with UCS level 3 found
> +Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
> +Eltorito validation header:
> + Hid 1
> + Arch 0 (x86)
> + ID ''
> + Key 55 AA
> + Eltorito defaultboot header:
> + Bootid 88 (bootable)
> + Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
> + Load segment 0
> + Sys type 0
> + Nsect 4
> + Bootoff 3C7DE 247774
> diff --git a/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6b00229
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
> +System id: LINUX
> +Volume id: Fedora-S-dvd-x86_64-26
> +Volume set id:
> +Publisher id:
> +Data preparer id:
> +Application id: GENISOIMAGE ISO 9660/HFS FILESYSTEM CREATOR (C) 1993 E.YOUNGDALE (C) 1997-2006 J.PEARSON/J.SCHILLING (C) 2006-2007 CDRKIT TEAM
> +Copyright File id:
> +Abstract File id:
> +Bibliographic File id:
> +Volume set size is: 1
> +Volume set sequence number is: 1
> +Logical block size is: 2048
> +Volume size is: 247765
> +El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 44
> +Joliet with UCS level 3 found
> +Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
> +Eltorito validation header:
> + Hid 1
> + Arch 0 (x86)
> + ID ''
> + Key 55 AA
> + Eltorito defaultboot header:
> + Bootid 88 (bootable)
> + Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
> + Load segment 0
> + Sys type 0
> + Nsect 4
> + Bootoff 3BA6E 244334
> diff --git a/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5df6286
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
> +System id: LINUX
> +Volume id: Fedora-WS-Live-26-1-5
> +Volume set id:
> +Publisher id:
> +Data preparer id:
> +Application id: GENISOIMAGE ISO 9660/HFS FILESYSTEM CREATOR (C) 1993 E.YOUNGDALE (C) 1997-2006 J.PEARSON/J.SCHILLING (C) 2006-2007 CDRKIT TEAM
> +Copyright File id:
> +Abstract File id:
> +Bibliographic File id:
> +Volume set size is: 1
> +Volume set sequence number is: 1
> +Logical block size is: 2048
> +Volume size is: 763281
> +El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 46
> +Joliet with UCS level 3 found
> +Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
> +Eltorito validation header:
> + Hid 1
> + Arch 0 (x86)
> + ID ''
> + Key 55 AA
> + Eltorito defaultboot header:
> + Bootid 88 (bootable)
> + Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
> + Load segment 0
> + Sys type 0
> + Nsect 4
> + Bootoff 5748 22344
> diff --git a/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c3eea05
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/isodata/fedora/fedora26/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-26-1.5.iso.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
> +System id: LINUX
> +Volume id: Fedora-WS-dvd-x86_64-26
> +Volume set id:
> +Publisher id:
> +Data preparer id:
> +Application id: GENISOIMAGE ISO 9660/HFS FILESYSTEM CREATOR (C) 1993 E.YOUNGDALE (C) 1997-2006 J.PEARSON/J.SCHILLING (C) 2006-2007 CDRKIT TEAM
> +Copyright File id:
> +Abstract File id:
> +Bibliographic File id:
> +Volume set size is: 1
> +Volume set sequence number is: 1
> +Logical block size is: 2048
> +Volume size is: 246513
> +El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 44
> +Joliet with UCS level 3 found
> +Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
> +Eltorito validation header:
> + Hid 1
> + Arch 0 (x86)
> + ID ''
> + Key 55 AA
> + Eltorito defaultboot header:
> + Bootid 88 (bootable)
> + Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
> + Load segment 0
> + Sys type 0
> + Nsect 4
> + Bootoff 3B58A 243082
> --
> 2.9.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libosinfo mailing list
> Libosinfo at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From ptoscano at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 11:23:38 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:23:38 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] fedora: add Fedora 26 info
In-Reply-To: <20170712074218.6xxhfyva32nbdt2y@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
References: <20170711155721.1765-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
<20170712074218.6xxhfyva32nbdt2y@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1630080.3ybv3G7jdV@thyrus.usersys.redhat.com>
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 09:42:18 CEST Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau
Thanks!
> (do you have commit access to the git repo?)
I do not, so could you push them, please? :)
--
Pino Toscano
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
From cfergeau at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 17:22:42 2017
From: cfergeau at redhat.com (Christophe Fergeau)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 19:22:42 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] fedora: add Fedora 26 info
In-Reply-To: <1630080.3ybv3G7jdV@thyrus.usersys.redhat.com>
References: <20170711155721.1765-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
<20170712074218.6xxhfyva32nbdt2y@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
<1630080.3ybv3G7jdV@thyrus.usersys.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170712172242.2z45iedsj7bbi7ni@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:23:38PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 09:42:18 CEST Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> >
> > Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau
>
> Thanks!
>
> > (do you have commit access to the git repo?)
>
> I do not, so could you push them, please? :)
Done, thanks!
Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From agx at sigxcpu.org Wed Jul 12 18:24:15 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:24:15 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] test-isodetect: fix parsing of
application, system and publisher id
In-Reply-To: <20170712073315.bjxjllibaujdp6ji@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
References: <20170711200026.wzsxeustwdimq2dy@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
<20170712073315.bjxjllibaujdp6ji@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170712182415.gxbeiyrpoo6ckb3r@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:33:15AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau
Pushed. Thanks
-- Guido
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:00:26PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> > ---
> > tests/test-isodetect.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/test-isodetect.c b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> > index 0e9aea5..c72b8fc 100644
> > --- a/tests/test-isodetect.c
> > +++ b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> > @@ -146,13 +146,13 @@ static struct ISOInfo *load_iso(GFile *file, const gchar *shortid, const gchar *
> > value = line + strlen("Volume id: ");
> > } else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "Publisher id: ")) {
> > key = OSINFO_MEDIA_PROP_PUBLISHER_ID;
> > - value = line + strlen("Volume id: ");
> > + value = line + strlen("Publisher id: ");
> > } else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "System id: ")) {
> > key = OSINFO_MEDIA_PROP_SYSTEM_ID;
> > - value = line + strlen("Volume id: ");
> > + value = line + strlen("System id: ");
> > } else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "Application id: ")) {
> > key = OSINFO_MEDIA_PROP_APPLICATION_ID;
> > - value = line + strlen("Volume id: ");
> > + value = line + strlen("Application id: ");
> > } else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "Logical block size is: ")) {
> > blk_size = (gint64) atoll(line + strlen("Logical block size is: "));
> > } else if (g_str_has_prefix(line, "Volume size is: ")) {
> > --
> > 2.13.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libosinfo mailing list
> > Libosinfo at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
From agx at sigxcpu.org Thu Jul 13 12:39:19 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:39:19 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] test-isodetect: add Debian's arm
flavours
In-Reply-To: <20170712073516.tj4cwhvcdvyrxdrl@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170713123919.onvz3p26hozq5cox@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:35:16AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:58:26PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> > to avoid "Unknown arch" debug messges
> > ---
> > tests/test-isodetect.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/test-isodetect.c b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> > index c72b8fc..6a38963 100644
> > --- a/tests/test-isodetect.c
> > +++ b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> > @@ -128,8 +128,12 @@ static struct ISOInfo *load_iso(GFile *file, const gchar *shortid, const gchar *
> > arch = "ia64";
> > else if (strstr(name, "s390x"))
> > arch = "s390x";
> > - else if (strstr(name, "aarch64"))
> > + else if (strstr(name, "aarch64") ||
> > + strstr(name, "arm64"))
> > arch = "aarch64";
>
> This change looks good.
>
> > + else if (strstr(name, "armhf") ||
> > + strstr(name, "armv7l"))
> > + arch = "armhf";
>
> However for this one I'd expect arch = "armv7l" as this is what is in
> the RNG schema? My understanding of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719609#c13 is that armv7l is
> a soft floating point arch, armv7hl would be hard floating point. And
> armhf is hard floating point as well. So I don't think we can consider
> the 2 are the same here. You probably need to add a new ARM arch to the
> schema file, and use that for armhf.
On my A20 Olinuxino I see
$ uname -m
armv7l
$ dpkg --print-architecture
armhf
I assumed that the armv7l refers to an architecture supporting hard
float but your link suggests otherwise. In this case we need to fixup
osinfo-db as well. I couldn't find any other good references on this.
I'll post a v2 for libosinfo and will fix osinfo-db if that looks o.k.
Cheers,
-- Guido
From agx at sigxcpu.org Thu Jul 13 12:39:47 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:39:47 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo v2] test-isodetect: add Debian's arm
flavours
Message-ID: <20170713123947.ena3ilqbhqacpdqg@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
to avoid "Unknown arch" debug messages
---
tests/test-isodetect.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/test-isodetect.c b/tests/test-isodetect.c
index c72b8fc..9306be4 100644
--- a/tests/test-isodetect.c
+++ b/tests/test-isodetect.c
@@ -128,8 +128,14 @@ static struct ISOInfo *load_iso(GFile *file, const gchar *shortid, const gchar *
arch = "ia64";
else if (strstr(name, "s390x"))
arch = "s390x";
- else if (strstr(name, "aarch64"))
+ else if (strstr(name, "aarch64") ||
+ strstr(name, "arm64"))
arch = "aarch64";
+ else if (strstr(name, "armv7l"))
+ arch = "armv7l";
+ else if (strstr(name, "armhf") ||
+ strstr(name, "armv7hl"))
+ arch = "armv7hl";
else {
g_debug("Unknown arch in %s", name);
arch = "i386";
--
2.13.2
From cfergeau at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 15:18:24 2017
From: cfergeau at redhat.com (Christophe Fergeau)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:18:24 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] test-isodetect: add Debian's arm
flavours
In-Reply-To: <20170713123919.onvz3p26hozq5cox@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
References: <20170712073516.tj4cwhvcdvyrxdrl@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
<20170713123919.onvz3p26hozq5cox@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Message-ID: <20170713151824.titl3nxox2tufiph@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 02:39:19PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:35:16AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> >
> > However for this one I'd expect arch = "armv7l" as this is what is in
> > the RNG schema? My understanding of
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719609#c13 is that armv7l is
> > a soft floating point arch, armv7hl would be hard floating point. And
>
>
>
> > armhf is hard floating point as well. So I don't think we can consider
> > the 2 are the same here. You probably need to add a new ARM arch to the
> > schema file, and use that for armhf.
>
> On my A20 Olinuxino I see
>
> $ uname -m
> armv7l
>
> $ dpkg --print-architecture
> armhf
>
> I assumed that the armv7l refers to an architecture supporting hard
> float but your link suggests otherwise. In this case we need to fixup
> osinfo-db as well. I couldn't find any other good references on this.
>
Oh well, I'm utterly confused by ARM arch names, so maybe armv7l and
armhf are the same, I would not know :(
Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From berrange at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 15:34:28 2017
From: berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrange)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:34:28 +0100
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] test-isodetect: add Debian's arm
flavours
In-Reply-To: <20170713151824.titl3nxox2tufiph@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
References: <20170712073516.tj4cwhvcdvyrxdrl@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
<20170713123919.onvz3p26hozq5cox@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
<20170713151824.titl3nxox2tufiph@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170713153428.GU4011@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 05:18:24PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 02:39:19PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:35:16AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > >
> > > However for this one I'd expect arch = "armv7l" as this is what is in
> > > the RNG schema? My understanding of
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719609#c13 is that armv7l is
> > > a soft floating point arch, armv7hl would be hard floating point. And
> >
> >
> >
> > > armhf is hard floating point as well. So I don't think we can consider
> > > the 2 are the same here. You probably need to add a new ARM arch to the
> > > schema file, and use that for armhf.
> >
> > On my A20 Olinuxino I see
> >
> > $ uname -m
> > armv7l
> >
> > $ dpkg --print-architecture
> > armhf
> >
> > I assumed that the armv7l refers to an architecture supporting hard
> > float but your link suggests otherwise. In this case we need to fixup
> > osinfo-db as well. I couldn't find any other good references on this.
> >
>
> Oh well, I'm utterly confused by ARM arch names, so maybe armv7l and
> armhf are the same, I would not know :(
So the architecture is basically "arm7" and QEMU emulates an 'arm7'
architecture.
hard float vs soft float is essentially referring to how the guest
software and kernel is compiled - whether it was built to use software
emulated floating point vs hardware floating point.
So as long as you tell QEMU to emulate a CPU model for arm7 that can
do hard float, then QEMU can support guests OS which use hard or soft
float.
This is a long winded way of saying that in terms of representing
architectures in libvirt and libosinfo, we don't need a distinction
between hard & soft float arm. They're all just arm7.
The distinction is more akin having an i686 guest, which is compiled
to assume a CPU model with SSE instructions. This is a concept we
don't track in libosinfo right now. We could, but I'd just ignore
until its critical (if ever).
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
From berrange at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 15:35:43 2017
From: berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrange)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:35:43 +0100
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo v2] test-isodetect: add Debian's
arm flavours
In-Reply-To: <20170713123947.ena3ilqbhqacpdqg@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
References: <20170713123947.ena3ilqbhqacpdqg@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Message-ID: <20170713153543.GV4011@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 02:39:47PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> to avoid "Unknown arch" debug messages
> ---
> tests/test-isodetect.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/test-isodetect.c b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> index c72b8fc..9306be4 100644
> --- a/tests/test-isodetect.c
> +++ b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> @@ -128,8 +128,14 @@ static struct ISOInfo *load_iso(GFile *file, const gchar *shortid, const gchar *
> arch = "ia64";
> else if (strstr(name, "s390x"))
> arch = "s390x";
> - else if (strstr(name, "aarch64"))
> + else if (strstr(name, "aarch64") ||
> + strstr(name, "arm64"))
> arch = "aarch64";
> + else if (strstr(name, "armv7l"))
> + arch = "armv7l";
> + else if (strstr(name, "armhf") ||
> + strstr(name, "armv7hl"))
> + arch = "armv7hl";
These should all just be normalizing to 'armv7l' - ie arm7 little endian. No
need for a hard vs soft float distinction here, that's just a CPU sub-feature
not a different architecture.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
From cfergeau at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 15:41:42 2017
From: cfergeau at redhat.com (Christophe Fergeau)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:41:42 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] test-isodetect: add Debian's arm
flavours
In-Reply-To: <20170713153428.GU4011@redhat.com>
References: <20170712073516.tj4cwhvcdvyrxdrl@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
<20170713123919.onvz3p26hozq5cox@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
<20170713151824.titl3nxox2tufiph@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
<20170713153428.GU4011@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170713154142.zxi5xyqfaiiwca7l@edamame.cdg.redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 04:34:28PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 05:18:24PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 02:39:19PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:35:16AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > > >
> > > > However for this one I'd expect arch = "armv7l" as this is what is in
> > > > the RNG schema? My understanding of
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719609#c13 is that armv7l is
> > > > a soft floating point arch, armv7hl would be hard floating point. And
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > armhf is hard floating point as well. So I don't think we can consider
> > > > the 2 are the same here. You probably need to add a new ARM arch to the
> > > > schema file, and use that for armhf.
> > >
> > > On my A20 Olinuxino I see
> > >
> > > $ uname -m
> > > armv7l
> > >
> > > $ dpkg --print-architecture
> > > armhf
> > >
> > > I assumed that the armv7l refers to an architecture supporting hard
> > > float but your link suggests otherwise. In this case we need to fixup
> > > osinfo-db as well. I couldn't find any other good references on this.
> > >
> >
> > Oh well, I'm utterly confused by ARM arch names, so maybe armv7l and
> > armhf are the same, I would not know :(
>
> So the architecture is basically "arm7" and QEMU emulates an 'arm7'
> architecture.
>
> hard float vs soft float is essentially referring to how the guest
> software and kernel is compiled - whether it was built to use software
> emulated floating point vs hardware floating point.
>
> So as long as you tell QEMU to emulate a CPU model for arm7 that can
> do hard float, then QEMU can support guests OS which use hard or soft
> float.
>
> This is a long winded way of saying that in terms of representing
> architectures in libvirt and libosinfo, we don't need a distinction
> between hard & soft float arm. They're all just arm7.
>
> The distinction is more akin having an i686 guest, which is compiled
> to assume a CPU model with SSE instructions. This is a concept we
> don't track in libosinfo right now. We could, but I'd just ignore
> until its critical (if ever).
Yup, makes a lot of sense, thanks for the detailed explanation!
Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From agx at sigxcpu.org Thu Jul 13 15:48:22 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:48:22 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo v2] test-isodetect: add Debian's
arm flavours
In-Reply-To: <20170713153543.GV4011@redhat.com>
References: <20170713123947.ena3ilqbhqacpdqg@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
<20170713153543.GV4011@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170713154822.jqbvz3cbwxleceh6@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 04:35:43PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 02:39:47PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> > to avoid "Unknown arch" debug messages
> > ---
> > tests/test-isodetect.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/test-isodetect.c b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> > index c72b8fc..9306be4 100644
> > --- a/tests/test-isodetect.c
> > +++ b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> > @@ -128,8 +128,14 @@ static struct ISOInfo *load_iso(GFile *file, const gchar *shortid, const gchar *
> > arch = "ia64";
> > else if (strstr(name, "s390x"))
> > arch = "s390x";
> > - else if (strstr(name, "aarch64"))
> > + else if (strstr(name, "aarch64") ||
> > + strstr(name, "arm64"))
> > arch = "aarch64";
> > + else if (strstr(name, "armv7l"))
> > + arch = "armv7l";
> > + else if (strstr(name, "armhf") ||
> > + strstr(name, "armv7hl"))
> > + arch = "armv7hl";
>
> These should all just be normalizing to 'armv7l' - ie arm7 little endian. No
> need for a hard vs soft float distinction here, that's just a CPU sub-feature
> not a different architecture.
That makes sense if armv7l mandates VFP. I couldn't figure that out
reliably yesterday but looking at [1] and [2] it seems so. It would be
be similar to mips running o32, n32 or n64 and all ABIs are supported by
the same CPU. v3 forthcoming.
Thanks for the clarification,
-- Guido
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_ARMv7-A_cores
[2]: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0471k/pge1358786964554.html
From agx at sigxcpu.org Thu Jul 13 15:49:02 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:49:02 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo v3] test-isodetect: add Debian's arm
flavours
Message-ID: <20170713154902.can2vfeandzcniwd@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
to avoid "Unknown arch" debug messages
---
tests/test-isodetect.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/test-isodetect.c b/tests/test-isodetect.c
index c72b8fc..7214531 100644
--- a/tests/test-isodetect.c
+++ b/tests/test-isodetect.c
@@ -128,8 +128,13 @@ static struct ISOInfo *load_iso(GFile *file, const gchar *shortid, const gchar *
arch = "ia64";
else if (strstr(name, "s390x"))
arch = "s390x";
- else if (strstr(name, "aarch64"))
+ else if (strstr(name, "aarch64") ||
+ strstr(name, "arm64"))
arch = "aarch64";
+ else if (strstr(name, "armv7l") ||
+ strstr(name, "armv7hl") ||
+ strstr(name, "armhf"))
+ arch = "armv7l";
else {
g_debug("Unknown arch in %s", name);
arch = "i386";
--
2.13.2
From berrange at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 16:04:54 2017
From: berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrange)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:04:54 +0100
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo v3] test-isodetect: add Debian's
arm flavours
In-Reply-To: <20170713154902.can2vfeandzcniwd@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
References: <20170713154902.can2vfeandzcniwd@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Message-ID: <20170713160454.GW4011@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 05:49:02PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> to avoid "Unknown arch" debug messages
> ---
> tests/test-isodetect.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/test-isodetect.c b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> index c72b8fc..7214531 100644
> --- a/tests/test-isodetect.c
> +++ b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> @@ -128,8 +128,13 @@ static struct ISOInfo *load_iso(GFile *file, const gchar *shortid, const gchar *
> arch = "ia64";
> else if (strstr(name, "s390x"))
> arch = "s390x";
> - else if (strstr(name, "aarch64"))
> + else if (strstr(name, "aarch64") ||
> + strstr(name, "arm64"))
> arch = "aarch64";
> + else if (strstr(name, "armv7l") ||
> + strstr(name, "armv7hl") ||
> + strstr(name, "armhf"))
> + arch = "armv7l";
> else {
> g_debug("Unknown arch in %s", name);
> arch = "i386";
ACK
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
From agx at sigxcpu.org Thu Jul 13 16:49:15 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 18:49:15 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo v3] test-isodetect: add Debian's
arm flavours
In-Reply-To: <20170713160454.GW4011@redhat.com>
References: <20170713154902.can2vfeandzcniwd@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
<20170713160454.GW4011@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170713164915.avldlqqv3kkatay6@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 05:04:54PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 05:49:02PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> > to avoid "Unknown arch" debug messages
> > ---
> > tests/test-isodetect.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/test-isodetect.c b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> > index c72b8fc..7214531 100644
> > --- a/tests/test-isodetect.c
> > +++ b/tests/test-isodetect.c
> > @@ -128,8 +128,13 @@ static struct ISOInfo *load_iso(GFile *file, const gchar *shortid, const gchar *
> > arch = "ia64";
> > else if (strstr(name, "s390x"))
> > arch = "s390x";
> > - else if (strstr(name, "aarch64"))
> > + else if (strstr(name, "aarch64") ||
> > + strstr(name, "arm64"))
> > arch = "aarch64";
> > + else if (strstr(name, "armv7l") ||
> > + strstr(name, "armv7hl") ||
> > + strstr(name, "armhf"))
> > + arch = "armv7l";
> > else {
> > g_debug("Unknown arch in %s", name);
> > arch = "i386";
>
> ACK
Pushed. Thanks
-- Guido
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
>
From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 11:02:19 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 13:02:19 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [libosinfo PATCH] tests: make the network tests run
Message-ID: <20170714110219.10378-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Load the default osinfo path, since the osinfo data are no more part of
the libosinfo sources.
The tests still fails though, but this is due to missing paths to ISOs
and trees.
---
tests/test-mediauris.c | 2 +-
tests/test-treeuris.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/test-mediauris.c b/tests/test-mediauris.c
index 46a68f0..5bfb4c9 100644
--- a/tests/test-mediauris.c
+++ b/tests/test-mediauris.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ START_TEST(test_uris)
fail_unless(OSINFO_IS_LOADER(loader), "Loader is not a LOADER");
fail_unless(OSINFO_IS_DB(db), "Db is not a DB");
- osinfo_loader_process_path(loader, SRCDIR "/data", &error);
+ osinfo_loader_process_default_path(loader, &error);
fail_unless(error == NULL, error ? error->message : "none");
oslist = osinfo_db_get_os_list(db);
diff --git a/tests/test-treeuris.c b/tests/test-treeuris.c
index b5c50c6..60692bc 100644
--- a/tests/test-treeuris.c
+++ b/tests/test-treeuris.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ START_TEST(test_uris)
fail_unless(OSINFO_IS_LOADER(loader), "Loader is not a LOADER");
fail_unless(OSINFO_IS_DB(db), "Db is not a DB");
- osinfo_loader_process_path(loader, SRCDIR "/data", &error);
+ osinfo_loader_process_default_path(loader, &error);
fail_unless(error == NULL, error ? error->message : "none");
oslist = osinfo_db_get_os_list(db);
--
2.9.4
From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 12:30:26 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 14:30:26 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH 0/4] Fix locations for some old distros
Message-ID: <20170714123030.19178-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Hi,
this series fixes most of the unreachable locations for ISOs and trees
of few distros. All the issues were found by running test-mediauris in
libisoinfo. The unreachable locations left are only for EOLed openSUSE
releases, as they are no more available on download.opensuse.org, and
there seems to not be an official location for them.
Thanks,
Pino Toscano (4):
centos: fix 6.9 tree location
debian: fix 7 ISO location
fedora: fix 24 ISO location
ubuntu: fix 15.10 & 16.04 locations
data/os/centos.org/centos-6.9.xml.in | 4 ++--
data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in | 4 ++--
data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-24.xml.in | 2 +-
data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-15.10.xml.in | 8 ++++----
data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.04.xml.in | 14 +++++++-------
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
2.9.4
From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 12:30:27 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 14:30:27 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH 1/4] centos: fix 6.9 tree location
In-Reply-To: <20170714123030.19178-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
References: <20170714123030.19178-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170714123030.19178-2-ptoscano@redhat.com>
It is not in vault yet.
---
data/os/centos.org/centos-6.9.xml.in | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/data/os/centos.org/centos-6.9.xml.in b/data/os/centos.org/centos-6.9.xml.in
index 06f683a..535a57b 100644
--- a/data/os/centos.org/centos-6.9.xml.in
+++ b/data/os/centos.org/centos-6.9.xml.in
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
- http://vault.centos.org/6.9/os/i386
+ http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.9/os/i386
CentOS
6.9
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
- http://vault.centos.org/6.9/os/x86_64
+ http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.9/os/x86_64
CentOS
6.9
--
2.9.4
From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 12:30:28 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 14:30:28 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH 2/4] debian: fix 7 ISO location
In-Reply-To: <20170714123030.19178-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
References: <20170714123030.19178-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170714123030.19178-3-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Point to the latest release of Debian 7.
---
data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in b/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in
index 0afe388..8c2d4ca 100644
--- a/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in
+++ b/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
- http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.9.0/i386/iso-dvd/debian-7.9.0-i386-DVD-1.iso
+ http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.11.0/i386/iso-dvd/debian-7.11.0-i386-DVD-1.iso
Debian 7.\d.\d i386 1
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
install.386/initrd.gz
- http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.9.0/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-7.9.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
+ http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.11.0/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-7.11.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
Debian 7.\d.\d amd64 1
--
2.9.4
From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 12:30:29 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 14:30:29 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH 3/4] fedora: fix 24 ISO location
In-Reply-To: <20170714123030.19178-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
References: <20170714123030.19178-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170714123030.19178-4-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Fix the URL to one of the ISOs, matching the "version" that all the
other ISOs in this version have.
---
data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-24.xml.in | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-24.xml.in b/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-24.xml.in
index e69cccc..ebd48e4 100644
--- a/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-24.xml.in
+++ b/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-24.xml.in
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
- http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/24/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-24.iso
+ http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/24/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-24-1.2.iso
Fedora-S-dvd-x86_64-24
LINUX
--
2.9.4
From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 12:30:30 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 14:30:30 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH 4/4] ubuntu: fix 15.10 & 16.04
locations
In-Reply-To: <20170714123030.19178-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
References: <20170714123030.19178-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170714123030.19178-5-ptoscano@redhat.com>
- Ubuntu 15.10 is EOL, so switch to the archive for old releases
- point to the latest release of Ubuntu 16.04
---
data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-15.10.xml.in | 8 ++++----
data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.04.xml.in | 14 +++++++-------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-15.10.xml.in b/data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-15.10.xml.in
index c394761..f99b523 100644
--- a/data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-15.10.xml.in
+++ b/data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-15.10.xml.in
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
- http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/wily/ubuntu-15.10-server-i386.iso
+ http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/wily/ubuntu-15.10-server-i386.iso
Ubuntu-Server 15.10(.\d)? i386
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
install/initrd.gz
- http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/wily/ubuntu-15.10-server-amd64.iso
+ http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/wily/ubuntu-15.10-server-amd64.iso
Ubuntu-Server 15.10(.\d)? amd64
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
install/initrd.gz
- http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/wily/ubuntu-15.10-desktop-i386.iso
+ http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/wily/ubuntu-15.10-desktop-i386.iso
Ubuntu 15.10(.\d)? i386
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
casper/initrd.lz
- http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/wily/ubuntu-15.10-desktop-amd64.iso
+ http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/wily/ubuntu-15.10-desktop-amd64.iso
Ubuntu 15.10(.\d)? amd64
diff --git a/data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.04.xml.in b/data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.04.xml.in
index 5300c0c..e11e0b8 100644
--- a/data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.04.xml.in
+++ b/data/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.04.xml.in
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
- http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/ubuntu-16.04-server-i386.iso
+ http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/ubuntu-16.04.2-server-i386.iso
Ubuntu-Server 16.04(.\d)? LTS i386
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
install/initrd.gz
- http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/ubuntu-16.04-server-amd64.iso
+ http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/ubuntu-16.04.2-server-amd64.iso
Ubuntu-Server 16.04(.\d)? LTS amd64
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
install/initrd.gz
- http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/ubuntu-16.04-desktop-i386.iso
+ http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/ubuntu-16.04.2-desktop-i386.iso
Ubuntu 16.04(.\d)? LTS i386
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
casper/initrd.lz
- http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/ubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso
+ http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/ubuntu-16.04.2-desktop-amd64.iso
Ubuntu 16.04(.\d)? LTS amd64
@@ -63,19 +63,19 @@
casper/initrd.lz
- http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/release/ubuntu-16.04-server-powerpc.iso
+ http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/release/ubuntu-16.04.2-server-powerpc.iso
Ubuntu-Server 16.04(.\d)? LTS ppc
- http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/release/ubuntu-16.04-server-ppc64el.iso
+ http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/release/ubuntu-16.04.2-server-ppc64el.iso
Ubuntu-Server 16.04(.\d)? LTS ppc64
- http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/release/ubuntu-16.04-server-s390x.iso
+ http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/release/ubuntu-16.04.2-server-s390x.iso
Ubuntu-Server 16.04(.\d)? LTS s390x
--
2.9.4
From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 13:32:31 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:32:31 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [libosinfo PATCH 1/2] tests: test-mediauris: skip
non-http URLs
Message-ID: <20170714133232.22976-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
The test uses libsoup, which supports only HTTP, and not other
protocols such as FTP. Hence, allow only http and https URLs.
---
tests/test-mediauris.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/test-mediauris.c b/tests/test-mediauris.c
index 5bfb4c9..afb055c 100644
--- a/tests/test-mediauris.c
+++ b/tests/test-mediauris.c
@@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ static void test_media(OsinfoMediaList *medialist, GError **error, SoupSession *
SoupMessage *msg;
guint status;
- if (url == NULL || g_str_equal(url, "")) {
+ if (url == NULL || g_str_equal(url, "") ||
+ (!g_str_has_prefix(url, "http://") && !g_str_has_prefix(url, "https://"))) {
tmp = tmp->next;
continue;
}
--
2.9.4
From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 13:32:32 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:32:32 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [libosinfo PATCH 2/2] tests: test-mediauris: show
status code on failure
In-Reply-To: <20170714133232.22976-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
References: <20170714133232.22976-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170714133232.22976-2-ptoscano@redhat.com>
It helps when debugging failures, to check what is actual error for an
URL.
---
tests/test-mediauris.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/test-mediauris.c b/tests/test-mediauris.c
index afb055c..1b330ed 100644
--- a/tests/test-mediauris.c
+++ b/tests/test-mediauris.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static void test_media(OsinfoMediaList *medialist, GError **error, SoupSession *
msg = soup_message_new("HEAD", url);
status = soup_session_send_message(session, msg);
- fail_unless(SOUP_STATUS_IS_SUCCESSFUL(status), "Failed HEAD on %s", url);
+ fail_unless(SOUP_STATUS_IS_SUCCESSFUL(status), "Failed HEAD (code=%u) on %s", status, url);
g_object_unref(msg);
tmp = tmp->next;
--
2.9.4
From agx at sigxcpu.org Fri Jul 14 14:04:37 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:04:37 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH 2/4] debian: fix 7 ISO location
In-Reply-To: <20170714123030.19178-3-ptoscano@redhat.com>
References: <20170714123030.19178-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
<20170714123030.19178-3-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170714140437.4ial3iyvyym5cymy@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:30:28PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Point to the latest release of Debian 7.
> ---
> data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in b/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in
> index 0afe388..8c2d4ca 100644
> --- a/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in
> +++ b/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
>
>
>
> - http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.9.0/i386/iso-dvd/debian-7.9.0-i386-DVD-1.iso
> + http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.11.0/i386/iso-dvd/debian-7.11.0-i386-DVD-1.iso
>
> Debian 7.\d.\d i386 1
>
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
> install.386/initrd.gz
>
>
> - http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.9.0/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-7.9.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
> + http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.11.0/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-7.11.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
>
> Debian 7.\d.\d amd64 1
>
While the old links are still valid it's nicer to use the last point
release. ACK.
-- Guido
> --
> 2.9.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libosinfo mailing list
> Libosinfo at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
>
From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:21:57 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:21:57 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH 2/4] debian: fix 7 ISO location
In-Reply-To: <20170714140437.4ial3iyvyym5cymy@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
References: <20170714123030.19178-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
<20170714123030.19178-3-ptoscano@redhat.com>
<20170714140437.4ial3iyvyym5cymy@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Message-ID: <4792849.4SD1OPGC9x@thyrus.usersys.redhat.com>
On Friday, 14 July 2017 16:04:37 CEST Guido G?nther wrote:
> Hi,
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:30:28PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > Point to the latest release of Debian 7.
> > ---
> > data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in b/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in
> > index 0afe388..8c2d4ca 100644
> > --- a/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in
> > +++ b/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in
> > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
> >
> >
> >
> > - http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.9.0/i386/iso-dvd/debian-7.9.0-i386-DVD-1.iso
> > + http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.11.0/i386/iso-dvd/debian-7.11.0-i386-DVD-1.iso
> >
> > Debian 7.\d.\d i386 1
> >
> > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
> > install.386/initrd.gz
> >
> >
> > - http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.9.0/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-7.9.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
> > + http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.11.0/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-7.11.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
> >
> > Debian 7.\d.\d amd64 1
> >
>
> While the old links are still valid it's nicer to use the last point
> release. ACK.
Actually, the old links are not valid -- only the latest version of a
stable series has media available.
--
Pino Toscano
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
From agx at sigxcpu.org Fri Jul 14 14:30:14 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:30:14 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH 2/4] debian: fix 7 ISO location
In-Reply-To: <4792849.4SD1OPGC9x@thyrus.usersys.redhat.com>
References: <20170714123030.19178-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
<20170714123030.19178-3-ptoscano@redhat.com>
<20170714140437.4ial3iyvyym5cymy@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
<4792849.4SD1OPGC9x@thyrus.usersys.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170714143014.gu3llk4y6nqbqud2@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:21:57PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> On Friday, 14 July 2017 16:04:37 CEST Guido G?nther wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:30:28PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > Point to the latest release of Debian 7.
> > > ---
> > > data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in b/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in
> > > index 0afe388..8c2d4ca 100644
> > > --- a/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in
> > > +++ b/data/os/debian.org/debian-7.xml.in
> > > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > - http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.9.0/i386/iso-dvd/debian-7.9.0-i386-DVD-1.iso
> > > + http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.11.0/i386/iso-dvd/debian-7.11.0-i386-DVD-1.iso
> > >
> > > Debian 7.\d.\d i386 1
> > >
> > > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
> > > install.386/initrd.gz
> > >
> > >
> > > - http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.9.0/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-7.9.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
> > > + http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.11.0/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-7.11.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
> > >
> > > Debian 7.\d.\d amd64 1
> > >
> >
> > While the old links are still valid it's nicer to use the last point
> > release. ACK.
>
> Actually, the old links are not valid -- only the latest version of a
> stable series has media available.
For oldstable (Debian 8) the point releases have media back to 8.4 so
there seems to be more than one version around. Weird. I've just pushed
this patch.
-- Guido
From ptoscano at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 10:23:35 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:23:35 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] mageia: add Mageia 6 info
Message-ID: <20170717102335.12815-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Sources:
- https://blog.mageia.org/en/2017/07/16/announcing-mageia-6/
- https://www.mageia.org/en/support/
---
data/os/mageia.org/mageia-6.xml.in | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 data/os/mageia.org/mageia-6.xml.in
diff --git a/data/os/mageia.org/mageia-6.xml.in b/data/os/mageia.org/mageia-6.xml.in
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..65eb2f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/os/mageia.org/mageia-6.xml.in
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+
+
+
+ mageia6
+ <_name>Mageia 6
+ <_vendor>Mageia
+ linux
+ mageia
+ 6
+
+ 2017-07-16
+ 2019-01-16
+
+
+
+ Mageia-6(.1)?(-i586)?
+
+
+
+
+ Mageia-6(.1)?(-x86_64)?
+
+
+
+
+ Mageia-6(.1)?-(GNOME|Plasma|Xfce)-LiveDVD
+
+
+
+
+ Mageia-6(.1)?-(GNOME|Plasma|Xfce)-LiveDVD
+
+
+
+
--
2.9.4
From ptoscano at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 10:23:53 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:23:53 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] mageia: fix/add eol-date for a couple of
versions
Message-ID: <20170717102353.12884-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Source:
- https://www.mageia.org/en/support/
---
data/os/mageia.org/mageia-3.xml.in | 2 +-
data/os/mageia.org/mageia-5.xml.in | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/data/os/mageia.org/mageia-3.xml.in b/data/os/mageia.org/mageia-3.xml.in
index 0a3e1bc..8647730 100644
--- a/data/os/mageia.org/mageia-3.xml.in
+++ b/data/os/mageia.org/mageia-3.xml.in
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
3
2013-05-19
- 2014-11-19
+ 2014-11-26
diff --git a/data/os/mageia.org/mageia-5.xml.in b/data/os/mageia.org/mageia-5.xml.in
index f6e8c46..5fdeaec 100644
--- a/data/os/mageia.org/mageia-5.xml.in
+++ b/data/os/mageia.org/mageia-5.xml.in
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
5
2015-06-19
+ 2017-10-31
--
2.9.4
From ptoscano at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 10:25:00 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:25:00 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [libosinfo PATCH] mageia: add Mageia 6 test data
In-Reply-To: <20170717102335.12815-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
References: <20170717102335.12815-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170717102500.13065-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
---
.../Mageia-6-LiveDVD-GNOME-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Plasma-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Xfce-i586-DVD.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Xfce-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-i586-DVD.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 174 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-GNOME-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Plasma-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Xfce-i586-DVD.iso.txt
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Xfce-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-i586-DVD.iso.txt
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
diff --git a/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-GNOME-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-GNOME-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d825b69
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-GNOME-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id:
+Volume id: Mageia-6-GNOME-LiveDVD
+Volume set id:
+Publisher id:
+Data preparer id: XORRISO-1.3.8 2014.06.28.071001, LIBISOBURN-1.3.8, LIBISOFS-1.3.8, LIBBURN-1.3.8
+Application id:
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 1060621
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 55
+Joliet with UCS level 3 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 38 56
diff --git a/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Plasma-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Plasma-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..24b8fa5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Plasma-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id:
+Volume id: Mageia-6-Plasma-LiveDVD
+Volume set id:
+Publisher id:
+Data preparer id: XORRISO-1.3.8 2014.06.28.071001, LIBISOBURN-1.3.8, LIBISOFS-1.3.8, LIBBURN-1.3.8
+Application id:
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 1282379
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 55
+Joliet with UCS level 3 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 38 56
diff --git a/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Xfce-i586-DVD.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Xfce-i586-DVD.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7f25adb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Xfce-i586-DVD.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id:
+Volume id: Mageia-6-Xfce-LiveDVD
+Volume set id:
+Publisher id:
+Data preparer id: XORRISO-1.3.8 2014.06.28.071001, LIBISOBURN-1.3.8, LIBISOFS-1.3.8, LIBBURN-1.3.8
+Application id:
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 968203
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 45
+Joliet with UCS level 3 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 2E 46
diff --git a/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Xfce-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Xfce-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..27612ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-LiveDVD-Xfce-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id:
+Volume id: Mageia-6-Xfce-LiveDVD
+Volume set id:
+Publisher id:
+Data preparer id: XORRISO-1.3.8 2014.06.28.071001, LIBISOBURN-1.3.8, LIBISOFS-1.3.8, LIBBURN-1.3.8
+Application id:
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 980055
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 55
+Joliet with UCS level 3 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 38 56
diff --git a/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-i586-DVD.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-i586-DVD.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9a374de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-i586-DVD.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id: MAGEIA
+Volume id: Mageia-6-i586
+Volume set id: Mageia 6 - i586 DVD
+Publisher id: MAGEIA
+Data preparer id: MAGEIA BCD
+Application id: MAGEIA 6
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 1914602
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 659
+Joliet with UCS level 3 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 294 660
diff --git a/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e048039
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/mageia/mageia6/Mageia-6-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id: MAGEIA
+Volume id: Mageia-6-x86_64
+Volume set id: Mageia 6 - x86_64 DVD
+Publisher id: MAGEIA
+Data preparer id: MAGEIA BCD
+Application id: MAGEIA 6
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 1905742
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 677
+Joliet with UCS level 3 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff AA6 2726
--
2.9.4
From ptoscano at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 13:09:22 2017
From: ptoscano at redhat.com (Pino Toscano)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 15:09:22 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] fedora: add EOL date for 24
Message-ID: <20170721130922.30919-1-ptoscano@redhat.com>
Source:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel at lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DNMTG4GZJRH6E3WLBNWVPUPGLESLOKBN/
---
data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-24.xml.in | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-24.xml.in b/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-24.xml.in
index ebd48e4..495b068 100644
--- a/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-24.xml.in
+++ b/data/os/fedoraproject.org/fedora-24.xml.in
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
2016-06-21
+ 2017-08-08
--
2.9.4
From agx at sigxcpu.org Sun Jul 23 12:01:42 2017
From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=)
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 14:01:42 +0200
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH osinfo-db] debian: switch to archive URLs for
stretch
Message-ID: <20170723120142.llzlbuqr2iw23l4q@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Now that the first point release is there switch to archive URLs since
these remain stable (at least as long as this is the current stable
release). The current URLs are now longer valid since the patchs contain
a 9.0.1 in the filename now.
---
data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in b/data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in
index 80cc048..759422b 100644
--- a/data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in
+++ b/data/os/debian.org/debian-9.xml.in
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
- http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/current/i386/iso-cd/debian-9.0.0-i386-netinst.iso
+ http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/9.0.0/i386/iso-cd/debian-9.0.0-i386-netinst.iso
Debian 9.(\d)+.(\d)+ i386 n
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
- http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-9.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso
+ http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/9.0.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-9.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso
Debian 9.(\d)+.(\d)+ amd64 n
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
- http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/current/arm64/iso-cd/debian-9.0.0-arm64-netinst.iso
+ http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/9.0.0/arm64/iso-cd/debian-9.0.0-arm64-netinst.iso
Debian 9.(\d)+.(\d)+ arm64 n
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
- http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/current/armhf/iso-cd/debian-9.0.0-armhf-netinst.iso
+ http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/9.0.0/armhf/iso-cd/debian-9.0.0-armhf-netinst.iso
Debian 9.(\d)+.(\d)+ armhf n
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
- http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/9.0.0/i386/iso-dvd/debian-9.0.0-i386-DVD-1.iso
+ http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/9.0.0/i386/iso-dvd/debian-9.0.0-i386-DVD-1.iso
Debian 9.(\d)+.(\d)+ i386 1
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
- http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/9.0.0/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-9.0.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
+ http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/9.0.0/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-9.0.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
Debian 9.(\d)+.(\d)+ amd64 1
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
- http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/9.0.0/arm64/iso-dvd/debian-9.0.0-arm64-DVD-1.iso
+ http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/9.0.0/arm64/iso-dvd/debian-9.0.0-arm64-DVD-1.iso
Debian 9.(\d)+.(\d)+ arm64 1
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
- http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/9.0.0/armhf/iso-dvd/debian-9.0.0-armhf-DVD-1.iso
+ http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/9.0.0/armhf/iso-dvd/debian-9.0.0-armhf-DVD-1.iso
Debian 9.(\d)+.(\d)+ armhf 1
--
2.13.2
From bogorodskiy at gmail.com Sun Jul 30 12:06:26 2017
From: bogorodskiy at gmail.com (Roman Bogorodskiy)
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 16:06:26 +0400
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH osinfo-db] freebsd: add FreeBSD 11.1 info
Message-ID: <20170730120626.78190-1-bogorodskiy@gmail.com>
---
data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-11.1.xml.in | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-11.1.xml.in
diff --git a/data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-11.1.xml.in b/data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-11.1.xml.in
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4635c17
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-11.1.xml.in
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+
+
+
+ freebsd11.1
+ <_name>FreeBSD 11.1
+ 11.1
+ <_vendor>FreeBSD Project
+ freebsd
+ freebsd
+
+
+
+ 2017-07-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso
+
+ FreeBSD
+ 11_1_RELEASE_AMD64_DVD
+
+
+
+ ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso
+
+ FreeBSD
+ 11_1_RELEASE_AMD64_CD
+
+
+
+ ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/11.0/FreeBSD-11.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso
+
+ FreeBSD
+ 11_1_RELEASE_I386_DVD
+
+
+
+ ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso
+
+ FreeBSD
+ 11_1_RELEASE_I386_CD
+
+
+
+
--
2.13.1
From bogorodskiy at gmail.com Sun Jul 30 12:08:10 2017
From: bogorodskiy at gmail.com (Roman Bogorodskiy)
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 16:08:10 +0400
Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] freebsd: add FreeBSD 11.1 isodata
Message-ID: <20170730120810.78387-1-bogorodskiy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Roman Bogorodskiy
---
.../FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso.txt
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso.txt
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso.txt
create mode 100644 tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.txt
diff --git a/tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0d4bcae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id: FreeBSD
+Volume id: 11_1_RELEASE_AMD64_CD
+Volume set id:
+Publisher id: THE FREEBSD PROJECT. HTTP://WWW.FREEBSD.ORG/
+Data preparer id:
+Application id:
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 353218
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 19
+NO Joliet present
+
+SUSP signatures version 1 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Rock Ridge id 'IEEE_P1282'
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Cksum AA 55 OK
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 14 20
diff --git a/tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a66e925
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id: FreeBSD
+Volume id: 11_1_RELEASE_AMD64_DVD
+Volume set id:
+Publisher id: THE FREEBSD PROJECT. HTTP://WWW.FREEBSD.ORG/
+Data preparer id:
+Application id:
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 1634843
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 19
+NO Joliet present
+
+SUSP signatures version 1 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Rock Ridge id 'IEEE_P1282'
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Cksum AA 55 OK
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 14 20
diff --git a/tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7701eac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id: FreeBSD
+Volume id: 11_1_RELEASE_I386_CD
+Volume set id:
+Publisher id: THE FREEBSD PROJECT. HTTP://WWW.FREEBSD.ORG/
+Data preparer id:
+Application id:
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 301753
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 19
+NO Joliet present
+
+SUSP signatures version 1 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Rock Ridge id 'IEEE_P1282'
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Cksum AA 55 OK
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 14 20
diff --git a/tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.txt b/tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..20dda39
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/isodata/freebsd/freebsd11.1/FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
+System id: FreeBSD
+Volume id: 11_1_RELEASE_I386_DVD
+Volume set id:
+Publisher id: THE FREEBSD PROJECT. HTTP://WWW.FREEBSD.ORG/
+Data preparer id:
+Application id:
+Copyright File id:
+Abstract File id:
+Bibliographic File id:
+Volume set size is: 1
+Volume set sequence number is: 1
+Logical block size is: 2048
+Volume size is: 1467791
+El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 19
+NO Joliet present
+
+SUSP signatures version 1 found
+Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found
+Rock Ridge id 'IEEE_P1282'
+Eltorito validation header:
+ Hid 1
+ Arch 0 (x86)
+ ID ''
+ Cksum AA 55 OK
+ Key 55 AA
+ Eltorito defaultboot header:
+ Bootid 88 (bootable)
+ Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot)
+ Load segment 0
+ Sys type 0
+ Nsect 4
+ Bootoff 14 20
--
2.13.1