[Libosinfo] [PATCH osinfo-db] freebsd: add FreeBSD 10.4 info

[Roman Bogorodskiy]

  Christophe Fergeau wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:38:41PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > ---
> >  data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-10.4.xml.in | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-10.4.xml.in
> > 
> > diff --git a/data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-10.4.xml.in b/data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-10.4.xml.in
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..5697b69
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-10.4.xml.in
> > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> > +<libosinfo version="0.0.1">
> > +<!-- Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 or later.
> > +     See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ for a copy of the license text -->
> > +  <os id="http://freebsd.org/freebsd/10.4">
> > +    <short-id>freebsd10.4</short-id>
> > +    <_name>FreeBSD 10.4</_name>
> > +    <version>10.4</version>
> > +    <_vendor>FreeBSD Project</_vendor>
> > +    <family>freebsd</family>
> > +    <distro>freebsd</distro>
> > +    <upgrades id="http://freebsd.org/freebsd/10.3"/>
> > +    <derives-from id="http://freebsd.org/freebsd/10.3"/>
> 
> There was some conversation on IRC regarding upgrades VS derives-from, I
> don't think derives-from is needed here.

Could you please clarify when it's appropriate to use derives-from?

PS It looks like these are not pushed yet. Do you want me to send v2
with derives-from dropped or you can amend that before pushing?

Thanks,

> Apart from this,
> Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com>
> 
> Christophe



Roman Bogorodskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/attachments/20171017/c897a464/attachment.sig>