[Libosinfo] [PATCH] endlessos: Add Endless OS 3.4

[Fabiano Fidêncio]

On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 11:15 +0100, Felipe Borges wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 9:41 AM Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio at redhat.com
> > wrote:
> > [snip]
> > 
> > > > > libosinfo has the concept of "language-map" in order to map
> > > > > some
> > > > > language code in the volume id to some locale identifier, see
> > > > > the
> > > > > data/os/microsoft.com/win-7.xml.in and
> > > > > data/datamap/microsoft.com/win-7-l10n-language.xml.in for
> > > > > example,
> > > > > imo it would be more appropriate to use that here rather than
> > > > > multiple
> > > > > variants.
> > > > 
> > > > The reasoning behind the use of multiple variants is that
> > > > Endless
> > > > ships different content in each image. The Spanish, Mexican,
> > > > Guatemalan "variants" have different content in it.
> > > > 
> > > > What do you think?
> > > 
> > > Are there ISOs with the same content, and whose only difference
> > > is their
> > > language? Or is each language also getting some variations in the
> > > available applications/...? This reasoning belongs in the commit
> > > log btw
> > > ;)
> > 
> > ping!
> > 
> > Felipe, Christophe,
> > 
> > Shall we merge this one with the changes proposed by Christophe?
> 
> The changes in the commit message or in the language-map?
> 
> As I mentioned previously, the images are not the same. If I want to
> test a specific app, It might be included in the Mexican version and
> not in the Guatemalan, even though both share the same language.

The commit message changes.
Christophe, are you okay with the changes in the commit message
considering Felipe's explanation?

If yes, I'll add the changes, check the tests and push the patches.

> 
> > Is there any plan to also add newer versions of Endless OS?
> 
> I think so. Leandro Stanger is involved with Endless and has filed
> issues such as https://gitlab.com/libosinfo/osinfo-db/issues/7 and he
> has been testing Boxes in EndlessOS and EndlessOS in Boxes. The
> reasoning is that it is the only hypervisor they have in their OS
> because of its Flatpak nature.

Yep. I've noticed the issue and also noticed that Leandro closed it
recently (and then I reopened it).

Okay, makes sense!

Best Regards,
-- 
Fabiano Fidêncio