[Libosinfo] [PATCH osinfo-db] netbsd: Add NetBSD 8.0 info

[Pierre-Alain TORET]

Hello,

On 24 July 2018 10:54 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:

> ​​
> 
> Hey,
> 
> For what it's worth, the <url> changes were again whitespace damaged, I
> 
> had to fix them manually to apply that patch.
> 

I will have to check the settings of my email client and fix that. Thanks for letting me know.

> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 04:21:13AM -0400, Pierre-Alain TORET wrote:
> 
> > -   <media arch="x86_64">
> > -        <url>https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-8.0/amd64/installation/cdrom/boot.iso</url>
> >         
> >     
> > -        <iso>
> >         
> >     
> > -          <system-id>NetBSD</system-id>
> >         
> >     
> > -          <volume-id>NETBSD_80</volume-id>
> >         
> >     
> > -          <volume-size>229435392</volume-size>
> >         
> >     
> > -        </iso>
> >         
> >     
> > -   </media>
> > -   <media arch="x86_64">
> > -        <url>https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-8.0/amd64/installation/cdrom/boot-com.iso</url>
> >         
> >     
> > -        <iso>
> >         
> >     
> > -          <system-id>NetBSD</system-id>
> >         
> >     
> > -          <volume-id>NETBSD_80</volume-id>
> >         
> >     
> > -          <volume-size>229435392</volume-size>
> >         
> >     
> > -        </iso>
> >         
> >     
> > -   </media>
> 
> These 2 entries are exactly identical, and I checked this is not a typo.
> 
> This is going to be a problem if we ever want to define variants to
> 
> differentiate between boot.iso (vga console) and boot-com.iso (serial
> 
> console). For now, this should be acceptable as they both will be
> 
> identified as netbsd 8.0 x86_64, which is correct. It would be great if
> 
> the netbsd people would make these 2 slightly different :)
> 

Agree with that, but I'm not involved in NetBSD actually. I just noticed the new release.

> Apart from this, looks good to me.
> 

> Christophe