[Libosinfo] [osinfo-db][PATCH] opensuse-unknown: Adjust the volume-id regex
Christophe Fergeau
cfergeau at redhat.com
Thu May 31 13:33:56 UTC 2018
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 02:57:14PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Christophe Fergeau
> >> <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 10:29:43PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >> >> The regex to match unknown openSUSE prereleases is becoming
> >> >> bigger and harder to read.
> >> >>
> >> >> Basically, what it's doing is:
> >> >>
> >> >> (15\.[1-9]|(1[6-9]|[23]|[5-9])[0-9]\.[0-9]|4[3-9]\.[0-9])
> >> >> --------- ----- ---------------- ---- -------------
> >> >> | | | | |
> >> >> v v v | v
> >> >> 15.1+ 16 20, 30, 50 - 90 v 43.0+
> >> >> .0, .1, ..., .9
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm desconsidering both the 13.x series or older and 42.x series as
> >> >> those are not going to have new releases anymore.
> >> >
> >> > "desconsidering"? Dropping?
> >>
> >> I'll change it to "Dropping" before pushing.
> >>
> >> > Note that
> >> > https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Roadmap does not entirely closes the
> >> > door on another 42.x release "There are currently no plans to release an
> >> > openSUSE Leap 42.4 aligned with the next service pack of SLE 12", but
> >> > that's close enough.
> >> > Are they really going to release 43.x in parallel to/after 15.x?
> >>
> >> No, they have no intention to release 43.x. I've talked to Richard
> >> Brown about this during openSUSE conference last weekend and
> >> explanation he gave me is that they're moving back to a number that
> >> would match SLES.
> >> The whole 42.x series was in order to totally distinguish between the
> >> old base they had with the new shiny system that Leap was supposed to
> >> be.
> >>
> >> So, they're now following 15.x ... if at some point SLES will have a
> >> 16.x opensuse 16.x will come to the playground as well.
> >
> > Your regexp in the commit log and in your patch has a 43.x part, so this
> > can be dropped.
>
> I see where the confusion came from.
> So, if you don't mind I'd prefer to keep it there because the regex is
> keep everything:
> 15.1+, 16-41, NOT 42, 43-99
Ah ok, you want to match all version numbers which never corresponded to
something which was released.
Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com>
Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/attachments/20180531/3af0e809/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libosinfo
mailing list