[Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH 2/5] Revert "centos7: Remove "upgrades" field"

[Christophe Fergeau]

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:42:31AM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> The upgrade feature does *not* inidcate whether the upgrade path is
> supported or not. It indicates that this realease is considered a newer
> version than the listed versions.

'indicate', 'release'

> 
> This reverts commit 335cd8c70e0edadaaa1b5aefa8f138b5839a9639.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio at redhat.com>
> ---
>  data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in
> index c3f45a2..20422f2 100644
> --- a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in
> +++ b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>      <_vendor>CentOS</_vendor>
>      <family>linux</family>
>      <distro>centos</distro>
> +    <upgrades id="http://centos.org/centos/6.5"/>

Shouldn't it be latest centos 6 release though?
For the revert, 
Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com>
as this can be done in another commit

Christophe

>      <clones id="http://redhat.com/rhel/7.6"/>
>  
>      <release-date>2014-07-07</release-date>
> -- 
> 2.19.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Libosinfo mailing list
> Libosinfo at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/attachments/20190109/7e38a5c3/attachment.sig>