[Libosinfo] [PATCH] rhel: Specify resources for all RHEL 6 releases

[Christophe Fergeau]

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 06:56:17PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> > NACK, this only addresses half of the review comments.
> 
> Can you please explain 1207959552 is not 1GB? Do you happen to mean
> 1000000000? The reason the term 'GiB' exists is because while GB might
> mean 1000000000, its almost always misused to mean 1207959552. If
> thats what you meant, Why do you want to use that value when you
> yourself are saying that its less accurate? Also why is it so
> important to use the less accurate value that these patches have to be
> NACKed for it?

Please check your facts before sending such inflammatory emails, thanks.
1GiB is 1073741824, and I did check that before sending the very first mail
talking about 1GB.

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/attachments/20121229/bba0316f/attachment.sig>