[Libosinfo] [PATCH] rhel: Specify resources for all RHEL 6 releases

[Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)]

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 06:56:17PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > NACK, this only addresses half of the review comments.
>>
>> Can you please explain 1207959552 is not 1GB? Do you happen to mean
>> 1000000000? The reason the term 'GiB' exists is because while GB might
>> mean 1000000000, its almost always misused to mean 1207959552. If
>> thats what you meant, Why do you want to use that value when you
>> yourself are saying that its less accurate? Also why is it so
>> important to use the less accurate value that these patches have to be
>> NACKed for it?
>
> Please check your facts before sending such inflammatory emails, thanks.
> 1GiB is 1073741824, and I did check that before sending the very first mail
> talking about 1GB.

I indeed did check my facts as I explained in my follow-up emails that
I made a mistake while checking it.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124