[Libosinfo] Anyone watching the fedorahosted bug tracker?

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Thu Apr 17 08:29:54 UTC 2014


On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:26:42PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> The libosinfo bug tracker seems to be entirely ignored, doesn't look like any
> bug that's ever been filed has had a response:
> 
> https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/report/8
> 
> There's at least 3 patches in there as well.
> 
> I assume this is mostly due to trac being really easy to ignore, and default
> assignee + cc list not setup. How do people feel about moving the bug tracker
> to bugzilla.redhat.com product=Virtualization Tools, which is what libvirt*,
> libguestfs, and virt-manager use.
> 
> If so the process would be:
> 
> - request the component with bugzilla-requests at redhat.com. they will need
> default assignee and cc list at least.
> - change libosinfo.org to point to the bugzilla instance rather than trac
> - once that's done, transfer over all the trac bugs, though I suspect many of
> them are obsolete.
> - send a request to fedora infrastructure to disable the trac bug tracker for
> https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/    (in fact, they can probably disable
> this page entirely, it's redundant since there's already libosinfo.org)
> 
> Thoughts?

If there is not much traffic on trac, we could also add that list to the
default CC: list of new bugs. bugzilla.redhat.com is also fine with me. 

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/attachments/20140417/8ed73c52/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libosinfo mailing list