[Libosinfo] Anyone watching the fedorahosted bug tracker?

[Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)]

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:26:42PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> The libosinfo bug tracker seems to be entirely ignored, doesn't look like any
>> bug that's ever been filed has had a response:
>>
>> https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/report/8
>>
>> There's at least 3 patches in there as well.
>>
>> I assume this is mostly due to trac being really easy to ignore, and default
>> assignee + cc list not setup. How do people feel about moving the bug tracker
>> to bugzilla.redhat.com product=Virtualization Tools, which is what libvirt*,
>> libguestfs, and virt-manager use.
>>
>> If so the process would be:
>>
>> - request the component with bugzilla-requests at redhat.com. they will need
>> default assignee and cc list at least.
>> - change libosinfo.org to point to the bugzilla instance rather than trac
>> - once that's done, transfer over all the trac bugs, though I suspect many of
>> them are obsolete.
>> - send a request to fedora infrastructure to disable the trac bug tracker for
>> https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/    (in fact, they can probably disable
>> this page entirely, it's redundant since there's already libosinfo.org)
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> If there is not much traffic on trac, we could also add that list to the
> default CC: list of new bugs. bugzilla.redhat.com is also fine with me.

Never really liked trac so moving to bugzilla would be nice.

Talking of which, I never understood why libosinfo lives on
fedorahosted. Could we maybe move it to libvirt, freedesktop.org,
gitorious or any other non-distro-specific infra? Any thoughts on
this?

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124